Home Blog - Agents of Change

 


SustainUS is not responsible for, and does not necessarily endorse, the content of these posts.
AoC Blog
AddThis Social Bookmark Button


What We Got From Copenhagen: A Growing Global Youth Climate Movement
Written by Kyle   
Sunday, 03 January 2010 00:00
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Now that the excitement around Copenhagen has died down a little, and we’ve had more than two weeks to sift through the countless analyses and debates about what we did or didn’t get out of the negotiations or the much-discussed Copenhagen Accord, there’s one thing we assuredly did succeed in making – a more diverse, powerful, and interconnected global movement of young people working to create a clean energy future.


A line of over 200 international youth show their support for African, small island, and least developed nations late in the negotiations.

In Copenhagen, more than 1,000 youth from over 100 countries participated in the climate negotiations. That’s to say nothing of the many more who were active in the streets of Copenhagen at the same time. Inside the negotiations, youth were celebrating a level of interest and participation in the negotiations never before seen – from only a handful of youth in the early years of the debates, to a rapid rise beginning in 2005 at the Montreal meeting. In recognition of this massive growth in youth involvement (a growth Brighter Planet users helped support by funding part of our Agents of Change delegation of U.S. youth), youth were for the first time recognized as a formal constituency in the international climate policy process, and were successful in securing significant funding from the Netherlands government.

This new status and funding helped us to achieve some incredible things. We were able to bring over 50 youth from Global South countries to the negotiations, youth who would have never had the chance to represent the young people in their society otherwise. This was in addition to the efforts of groups like SustainUS, who also raised money for new youth to come. SustainUS helped to raise money for Latin American youth to participate in Copenhagen. International youth helped to fund several pre-Copenhagen training sessions to mobilize youth around the world who couldn’t make it to Copenhagen. U.S. youth, for example, generated thousands of calls to their Senators, Representatives, the State Department, and the White House, and SustainUS delegates were featured in almost 100 media stories in the U.S., helping to motivate their campuses and communities for strong climate action. Youth from many countries were similarly successful in motivating their hometowns.

Most excitingly, the global youth climate movement has now become a permanent organization, working to mobilize youth year-round. With the election of two “Focal Points” – official liaisons to the United Nations, the creation of a core team of youth representatives from many countries (including three from SustainUS), the hiring of talented youth to help build our movement full-time, and even more interest from funders in supporting our success, international youth now have a solid platform to build toward stronger climate action over the next year, leading up to the next major negotiations in December 2010 in Mexico City.

Building a movement is not a climate success story in itself, most would argue, and international youth agree that the partnerships we’ve made and friendships we’ve formed are not our ultimate goal. Still, surrounded by so many of our global youth allies, it’s hard not to feel optimistic for our future and our generation, if only we can keep the momentum we’ve built in such a short time.

SustainUS hosts the website for the global youth climate movement. Learn more at: www.youthclimate.org

 
High and low-lights from Copenhagen: Island states, Shaved heads and a Disappointing US position
Written by Odette Mucha   
Tuesday, 29 December 2009 00:00
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The 15th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (or COP15 for short) is now officially over. In my opinion, and in the opinions of most people here, it was a big flop. There was no consensus, no binding international treaty. I thought it all went down in a strange sort of way.

To start off, the negotiations were going along in their usual UN way. Negotiators from 192 countries were debating how to change the Kyoto Protocol, what to do about forests, how to transfer technology, and how to move forward, past 2012 (when the Kyoto Protocol’s first commitment period is over). I got the change to sit in the plenary sessions, and see everyone in front of their microphones. There was a speakers’ list, and the Chair kept order. It was cool to see how similar the process really is to what I had been exposed to during Model UN in high school. It was also filled with a crazy insider’s language — highly technical and coded with phrases like “Moving on to agenda item four/SBTA/REDD/ provisional text 5, article 3, line 7”.

The first thing to make the news was on the first Wednesday, when Tuvalu, a tiny island nation in the Pacific, called for a suspension of the talks. In response to a lack of consensus around moving towards a binding treaty, Tuvalu proposed a “contact group” which is an official meeting where more discussions can occur outside of the plenary on a certain issue. Tuvalu wants to see the Kyoto Protocol continue and create a new binding treaty with strong emissions reductions targets for all nations who are not under the Kyoto Protocol. This is important, because the US did not ratify the Kyoto Protocol, and so Tuvalu’s proposal would include the US as well.

It was really confusing to figure out what the heck was going on, while sitting in the room. But what wasn’t confusing was Tuvalu’s presence! The UN system is a true marvel. Each country gets a voice, even if you only have a population of less than 12,000 people. Tuvalu’s negotiator was a white man with a British accent. Apparently his name is Ian Fry. British or Tuvaluan, he did a great job speaking up for the people who are most vulnerable to climate change, and who have the most to lose from inaction.

Check out a clip of one of the speeches from Tuvalu. Their lead negotiator underlines the role of the US Senate in holding up international progress on climate change. After Tuvalu, you’ll see Connie Hedeggard, the president of COP15, and an environment minister from Denmark. There were very few moments of passion and candor during the whole two weeks, so you’re lucky YouTube can edit out the boring moments!

There was also a hubbub around the “leaked” Danish text. The Danish delegation had prepared a text prior to the negotiations, and was showing it around for feedback from several developed (ie rich) countries. It was leaked to the press, and the developing countries were furious for being left out of the process. It was also very weak and did not call for a legally binding treaty.

Despite the confusion, there was some progress made on a few issues. Namely, on the issue of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in developing countries (REDD), which lays out how to give countries credit for preserving their forests as carbon sinks. They also made progress on how to help transfer clean energy technology to developing countries. In addition Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, announced on the second to last day, that the United States’ was willing to contribute towards a global goal of $100 billion towards helping developing countries address climate change.

But enough about inside the meetings. The real excitement was going on outside the talks. There were hundreds of side events – talks from leaders of every environmental organization in the world, every government, all talking about climate change! I felt like a kid in a huge candy store! The US had its own “center” which was a space with some cloth walls and chairs. They had a Cabinet member speak practically each day – Head of EPA, Secretary Chu of Department of Energy, Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, reps from NASA, NOAA, you name it!

Besides attending side event, as part of SustainUS, I did a ton of activism. Our group of 25 under 26 cooperated with all groups of youth from the US and around the world. Actions included asking tough questions to those Cabinet members I spoke of, and to other US reps like John Kerry and the US negotiator, Jonathan Pershing. We also called back home to activists around the country having them call the White House and their Seantors’ offices. And of course, we had actions to get media attention, including events holding up signs, chanting, and dressing up both inside and outside the conference center. Towards the end, we held a sit-in, fasted for a day, and some of us even shaved our heads!! (Don’t worry, I wasn’t one of them!) As a result, SustainUS made it into stories in the Washington Post, NPR, Wall Street Journal, Le Monde, BBC, and the Guardian, to name a few!

Then, during the last 2 days, everything turned topsey turvey. Outside the center, protests heated up, and people were getting arrested (none of our people) all over the place. Some environmental organizations weren’t allowed in the center for no apparent reason, and for those of us they did let in, we were limited to only a small percentage of our group. Apparently, this is unprecedented!

Then, the heads of state came in, and the whole negotiation flipped on its head again. The US ended up ditching the entire multilateral process, and wrote up a lame “political agreement” with China, Brazil, India and only a few other countries sitting around a table in a back room somewhere. The rest of everything was pushed off for COP16, to be held in Mexico City in 2010. So, coming into this, we all knew that the US wanted a political agreement, not a binding treaty. But, it’s incredible to me how the US gets what it wants! The entire world was opposed to this outcome — even the US negotiators, even Obama! They claimed that because the Senate hadn’t yet voted on a climate bill, that their hands were tied. This is not entirely true. But beyond that, it just felt so wrong. It went against the entire UN process, and ignored the voices of so many countries, including that of Tuvalu and all the small island nations whose people are in mortal peril because of climate change.

The US seriously let down the whole world, and President Obama’s only excuse was the Senate… In my opinion, if he was serious about climate change action – he would have made the Senate take on the issue sooner! Back in the summer, right after the House passed the Waxman Markey bill, the Senate was ready, but somehow health care bumped it off the agenda. This is unexcusable. The pundits all know that whatever Obama wants, the majority of the public will support.. much more so than leaving issues up to Senators to gain popularity. Obama let the world down. And I think it came as a surprise to him. I don’t really think he expected such enthusiasm, dedication, commitment and passion from every corner of the globe around fighting climate change. In my opinion, it is the one issue the world can agree on….except of course for the one country that can do the most to stop it.

 
Life Goes on outside Bella Center
Written by Valida Prentice   
Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:57
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Cross-posted from theClimateers.org

I spent months helping prepare policy briefs on adaptation, plan how the SustainUS communications team would interface with policy and actions, and set up a framework for the international youth communications and media production teams to work within at COP. All that is now over. My personal (unaffiliated) involvement in yesterday's unapproved sit-in inside the Bella Center served as a transition into a new activist life outside of the COP-15 conference center.

DSC_6017

In the end, we held our sit-in for nine hours. At around 2am, we walked away voluntarily (in some senses of the word), because the UNFCCC Secretariat and the security guards communicated an ultimatum to us: if they had to physically remove us, all 300 NGO observers (reduced from the 7,000 allowed in on Tuesday and Wednesday) would be banned from entry on Thursday and Friday. Three hundred is a paltry sum compared to the total number of accredited NGO observers (around 20,000), but it is better than zero.

Our diverse group of sitters-in was concerned about the silencing of civil society voices, and we considered being arrested to show our dedication to voicing this concern. However, we agreed that to silence civil society voices further would hurt, not help, the chances for a fair, ambitious, and legally binding deal. We were holding our sit-in to share this ask, signed by over 12 million people now, with negotiators and press in the Bella Center. We were therefore unwilling to further reduce the already small chances for success in achieving this real deal in Copenhagen by allowing the UNFCCC to use our sit-in as an excuse to shut out civil society completely.

Our procession out of the Bella Center was bittersweet - mostly bitter. The sit-in had been a great success in some ways:

  • gaining tons of media attention,
  • engendering more smiles and thumbs up than we'd seen in the last 10 days in the Bella Center combined,
  • and giving all of us an uplifting feeling as we realized we were not only supporting something we believed in but were also concurrently supported (and in some cases personally thanked) by millions of people in the Bella Center and around the world including friends in the youth climate movement, official country delegates, and John Kerry.
But as we left, we knew our impact inside the Bella Center was over, and with stalled negotiations over unacceptable texts, it felt like we hadn't achieved enough.

 

But today was a new day. I woke up rejuvenated after five and a half hours of sleep. This movement is still growing. Although we're closer to tripping over climate tipping points with each delay of a binding, science-based treaty, this movement is going to continue to charge ahead with increasing power. With the added urgency to mitigate climate change and the added need to help affected communities adapt to changes we can no longer avoid, the undercurrent I'm feeling among (my mostly new) friends here is that it is time to bring this movement to a new level. Welcome International Youth Climate Movement version 2.0.

Today, I fasted in solidarity with three Climate Justice Fasters who are now on day 42 (!!!) of a water-only fast. For me, this cleanse is also a symbolic clearing of my system as I prepare for a new kind of involvement in an improved movement.

Tomorrow, I will continue (that is, unless I chicken out) down this path of a symbolic restart by shaving my head with a group of other activists in front of the Bella Center. Other things shaving my head could possibly end up symbolizing include: the ugly negotiating process, the bad decisions made by negotiators, or the catastrophic changes that unabated climate change could bring about.

Those are risks I'm willing to take, though, because if the shave does turn out horribly, it will be, as the Climate Justice Fast was explained to me, a form of penance for being a part of the problem and not effective enough as part of the solution til now. At the same time, though, my shaved head will provide a promise of new growth - personally, in the movement, and for the world - to help us rise up above the challenges we have created for ourselves.

Life goes on and we will not let it pass us by. We won't just sit and wait for a fair, ambitious, and legally binding deal. We will make it happen.

Last Updated on Saturday, 26 December 2009 10:52
 
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Page 5 of 48